Vitaebase
⚡Exercise Snacks

Fragmented versus traditional resistance training: a randomized controlled trial on muscular strength, endurance, and enjoyment in recreationally trained young adults.

Zhai R, Yang K, Dai H, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Wu X, Wang L

Journal of exercise science and fitness · October 1, 2026

Randomized Controlled Trial🇨🇳China

Traditional resistance training requires prolonged continuous sessions, which may limit participation among time-constrained individuals. Fragmented resistance training (FRT), derived from 'exercise snacking,' may offer a more flexible alternative, but comparative evidence with traditional resistance training (TRT) remains limited. This study examined the effects of 8 weeks of FRT and TRT on muscular fitness and exercise enjoyment in 45 recreationally trained male students (18-25 years, ≥6 months training). Participants were randomised to FRT (three daily short bouts, 1×20 squats each), TRT (one continuous session, 3×20 squats), or a time-matched control group. Training was performed three times/week for 8 weeks using Smith-machine squats, with volume matched and intensity progressing from 40% to 55% of 1RM. Outcomes included 1RM strength, isometric squat force, relative muscular endurance (repetitions at 40% of current 1RM), and PACES enjoyment. Both FRT and TRT significantly outperformed the control in 1RM strength (FRT: +20.59 kg [8.69-32.49], p < 0.001; TRT: +28.93 kg [17.05-40.82], p < 0.001), isometric squat force (FRT: +27.89 kgf [12.15-43.64], p < 0.001; TRT: +35.24 kgf [19.48-51.00], p < 0.001) and relative muscular endurance (FRT: +9.97 repetitions [1.68-18.27], p = 0.020; TRT: +14.11 repetitions [5.84-22.38], p < 0.001), with no significant differences between FRT and TRT group (p = 0.164, 0.353 and 0.320). FRT reported significantly higher enjoyment than TRT (p = 0.034). These findings suggest FRT and TRT produce comparable improvements in strength and endurance under volume-matched conditions, both superior to control. FRT was more enjoyable, indicating it may serve as a practical alternative for time-constrained young adults, though further research on long-term adherence is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500115052.

This is evidence for Exercise Snacks. Already doing it? See how it counts towards your Longevity Score

Sponsored By

Sponsors have no influence on evidence, impact scores, or the science itself.

PMID: 42729992 · DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2026.200521

View original study ↗
Featured on
Featured on LaunchAF