Vitaebase
🚴Cycling

Association of Cycling with Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.

Zhao Y, Hu F, Feng Y, Yang X, Li Y, Guo C, Li Q, Tian G, Qie R, Han M, Huang S, Wu X, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Liu D, Zhang D, Cheng C, Zhang M, Yang Y, Shi X, Lu J, Hu D

Sports Medicine · July 1, 2021

Meta-Analysis🇨🇳China

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 cohort studies with 478,847 participants examining cycling and mortality risk. The highest versus lowest cycling level was associated with a 23% reduction in all-cause mortality and a 24% reduction in cardiovascular disease mortality. All-cause mortality risk declined linearly with more cycling, while cardiovascular mortality followed a U-shaped pattern with an estimated optimal benefit around 15 MET-h/week. The authors conclude that any level of cycling is better than none for all-cause mortality, while an appropriate (not unlimited) level appears optimal for cardiovascular mortality specifically.

This is evidence for Cycling. Already doing it? See how it counts towards your Longevity Score

Sponsored By

Sponsors have no influence on evidence, impact scores, or the science itself.

PMID: 33774807 · DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01452-7

View original study ↗
Featured on
Featured on LaunchAF