Vitaebase
💗Zone 2

High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weston KS, Wisløff U, Coombes JS

British journal of sports medicine · August 1, 2014

Meta-Analysis🇦🇺Australia

Background/Aim: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong determinant of morbidity and mortality. In athletes and the general population, it is established that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in improving CRF. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the efficacy and safety of HIIT compared to MICT in individuals with chronic cardiometabolic lifestyle diseases. Results: 10 studies with 273 patients were included. Participants had coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and obesity. There was a significantly higher increase in the VO2peak after HIIT compared to MICT (MD 3.03 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.07), equivalent to 9.1%. Conclusions: HIIT significantly increases CRF by almost double that of MICT in patients with lifestyle-induced chronic diseases.

This is evidence for Zone 2. Already doing it? See how it counts towards your Longevity Score

Sponsored By

Sponsors have no influence on evidence, impact scores, or the science itself.

PMID: 24144531 · DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092576

View original study ↗
Featured on
Featured on LaunchAF