Leisure Activities and All-Cause Mortality Among the Chinese Oldest-Old Population: A Prospective Community-Based Cohort Study.
Li ZH, Zhang XR, Lv YB, Shen D, Li FR, Zhong WF, Huang QM, Wu XB, Zeng Y, Gao X, Shi XM, Mao C
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · June 1, 2020
Objective: To investigate associations between leisure activities, examining each activity separately and in combination, and all-cause mortality among the Chinese oldest-old (≥80 years) population. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Community-living, the oldest-old from 22 provinces in China. Participants: We included 30,070 Chinese individuals aged ≥80 years (mean age: 92.7 years) from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey from 1998 to 2014. Measurements: Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relationships between leisure activities and all-cause mortality, adjusting for covariates including sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, self-reported medical history, and other potential confounders. Results: During 110,278 person-years of follow-up, 23,661 deaths were documented. Participants who engaged in watching TV or listening to the radio, playing cards or mah-jong, reading books or newspapers, gardening, keeping domestic animals or pets, or attending religious activities "almost every day" had a significantly lower mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratios ranged from 0.82 to 0.89; P < .01 for all) than did participants who "never" engaged in those activities. Furthermore, engagement in multiple leisure activities was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (P for the trend < .001). Conclusions And Implications: Frequent participation in leisure activities might help decrease the risk of death in the Chinese oldest-old population. This finding has important implications for public health policy and encourages the incorporation of a broad range of leisure activities into the daily lives of oldest-old individuals.
This is evidence for Gardening. Already doing it? See how it counts towards your Longevity ScoreSponsored By
Sponsors have no influence on evidence, impact scores, or the science itself.
PMID: 31588027 · DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.003
View original study ↗